Tuesday, June 21, 2011

Poetry of Witness

           From the poems listed in poetry of witness I have chosen to write about "Charlie Howard's Descent" by Mark Doty and “The Woman Hanging from the Thirteenth Floor Window” by Joy Harjo. Both poems impacted me emotionally, though for different reasons. Although they both pertain to death, they do so in two very different ways (one a murder and the other a suicide of sorts.) the following is based on my interpretation of these two poems.
In "Charlie Howard's Descent” the main character is a gay youth who is thrown off of a bridge by a couple of homophobic men. The poem states in part “Between the bridge and the river/he falls through/a huge portion of night; /it is not as if falling/ is something new…” (Doty, lines 1-4) The part that stood out to me in this poem is that, when I first read it, I had no idea what it was about. I wanted to know more about the situation as soon as I was done reading it. The author uses such great imagery, especially when in the description of Charlie Howard, when he says, “and his earrings shone and his wrists/were as limp as they were.” (Doty, lines 18-19) I did a little research and found out what the poem was about and I was immediately outraged. In real life, Charlie had told the men who threw him off the bridge that he could not swim “it's all right, that he knows/ they didn't believe him/ when he said he couldn't swim, /and blesses his killers” (Doty, lines 46-48) in fact the perpetrators later said in court that they did not believe Charlie could not swim. Before reading this poem, I had never heard about this incident. I like that the author raised awareness about this event with this powerful poem.

            In “The Woman Hanging from the Thirteenth Floor Window” the author write with such detail it is sometimes hard to understand, in the course of the poem she talks about her family, “She is a woman of children, of the baby, Carlos, / and of Margaret, and of Jimmy who is the oldest./ She is her mother's daughter and her father's son./ She is several pieces between the two husbands” (Harjo, lines 10-13) and her childhood, “When she was young she ate wild rice on scraped down / plates in warm wood rooms. It was in the farther / north and she was a baby then. They rocked her.” (Harjo, lines 16-19) From what I gathered from the poem, the main character feels trapped in her own life and is contemplating suicide because she feels dead inside- like she has wasted her life. In the end she decides to continue living and goes back inside “She think she remembers listening to her own life/ break loose, as she falls from the 13th floor/window on the east side of Chicago, or as she climbs back up to claim herself again.” (Harjo, lines 61-65) This stuck out to me because it seemed like the author was indecisive about dying or not dying, like it could go either way and she would not care.
            To close, I would like to stay that both poems were written with an air of sadness, I feel that the either poem could be read multiple times and never fully understood. The authors both did an amazing job conveying their point. I like that they both concluded with a hint towards the future, in “Charlie Hoards Decent” the author says “and blesses his killers/ in the way that only the dead/ can afford to forgive.” (Doty, 56-57) While in “The Woman Hanging from the Thirteenth Floor Window” the author states the lead character “she climbs back up to claim herself again” (Harjo, line 64) both lines give a feeling of hope to the reader.
Citations
1. Harjo, Joy. “The Woman Hanging from the Thirteenth Floor Window.”  Poetryfoundation.org. Poetry Foundation, Web. 21 June, 2011
2.  Doty, Mark. "Charlie Howard's Descent.”
http://www.angelfire.com/ca4/strawberry/descent.html, Charlie Howard’s Descent, Web. 21 June, 2011
Link: http://behindthelinespoetry.blogspot.com/2010/10/mark-dotys-charlie-howards-descent.html

Wednesday, June 15, 2011

Summary versus analysis

Summary versus analysis
            To understand the difference between summary and analysis I will first give a short definition of each (from http://comptalk.fiu.edu/analysis_v.htm)  according to this website, a Summary is, “a brief paragraph describing and informing three or more of the following elements,” including who, what, when, where, why and  how. Basically, a summary is explaining the course of whatever has happened. For example, if I was to summarize to someone the story of Chuck Palahniuk’s Lullaby I might start by saying that the book was based around an ancient culling song (used to kill) which people increasingly take advantage of through the course of the book. I might then go on to explain main characters in the book (briefly) and the overall plot of the book, I would then give a closure to the paper and in doing so have briefly described the beginning middle and end of the story.
            On the other hand, an analysis “examines the summary elements described above in order to look for their meaning in the following contexts,” an analysis looks more intensely at  
“relationships, roles of people, consequences or results of events, causes and their effects advantages and disadvantages/ gains and losses, as well as strengths and weaknesses,” and will delve deeper into the plot of a story and the characters involved. Back to the example of Chuck Palahniuk’s Lullaby, if I was to use analysis instead of summary in a paper I would cite individual characters more frequently and put more of my own personal opinion in the paper. An analysis is more personal, I might refer to the characters personal life and death of his family as a sort or rebirth of the main character, Mr. Streator. I might also show the impact of the character Helen Hoover Boyle as a whole.
I think the main difference is that a summary is more fact based and an analysis is more personal and a deeper interpretation.


 

Wednesday, June 8, 2011

What makes a good blog

Nabokov thinks that  a good reader should “belong to a book club… identify with the hero… concentrate on  the socio-economic triangle…  should prefer a story with action and dialogue… see the book in a movie… be a budding author… have imagination and should have memory. ”
I agree with his thoughts of what makes a good reader, especially identifying with the hero (people are more apt to pay attention to what interests them) and being an author. In addition to those listed, I think that a good reader must enjoy the material presented to get the full effect. Overall, I consider myself a good reader because of how involved I get in my reading.

http://www.martininstitute.org/events/2011-summer-conference-jun-15-16/browse-sessions/288-what-makes-a-good-reader-and-writer.html